Mueller Investigation Was Driven by Pious Hypocrisy

Mueller Investigation Was Driven by Pious HypocrisySpecial counselor Robert Mueller’s two-year, $30 million, also 448-page report failed to locate collusion between Donald Trump and Russia.Despite compiling personal allegations of loud and uncontrollable Trump behavior, Mueller also concluded that there was no actionable instance of obstruction of justice from the president. It might have been difficult in any case to find that Trump obstructed Mueller’s investigation of an alleged crime.Onethat there wasn’t an offense of collusion. Mueller should have understood that truth, but he pushed ahead anyway. It is almost impossible to demonstrate barrier of nothing.Two, Trump cooperated with the investigation. Executive privilege was waived by him. He turned over more than 1 million pages of documents. He allowed then–White House counselor Don McGahn to submit to over 30 hours of questioning by Mueller’s lawyers.Three, anyone targeted with a large evaluation who knows he’s innocent of the alleged crime is likely to become frustrated over a seemingly never-ending inquisition.Trump’s reported casual rages at the Muller investigation are regrettable but perhaps not unnatural, given that Mueller expended a large amount of government resources to affirm what many knew at the outset: there was never any collusion with the Russian authorities to twist the 2016 election.Yet Mueller’s team travelled down every blind alley concerning its own investigation — except where Obama-era officials were probably culpable for relevant illegal or unethical behavior.The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants were integral to Mueller’s investigations. But there is no mention of how the FISA court had been deceived by not being told that the chief evidence used to obtain the warrants was an unverified dossier compensated for in part by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.Some of the collusion story Muller analyzed was based on FBI informants’ unverified stories. Yet strangely, the Mueller team did not investigate if it was lawful in the first spot for the FBI, possibly with CIA assistance, to utilize informants to spy in a presidential campaign.Former FBI manager James Comey figures into the Mueller report. However there is no curiosity about if he broke the law in leaking that which might happen to be four classified memos of private presidential conversations to the press with the intention of forcing a consultation of a special counsel.The Christopher Steele dossier likewise makes an appearance in the Mueller report. But for a team investigating the alleged collusion of foreigners in a U.S. election, there is silence about the salient truth that Steele, a foreign national, enlisted other foreign nationals to dig up dirt on Trump to weaken his election opportunities — with a part of their financing for this research provided by the Clinton campaign and also the DNC.What disturbs many Americans regarding the collusion hoax is that the corresponding sanctimony of this so-called researchers. The Mueller group could have helped itself had it just noted that much of the evidence it appeared at was a commodity of Obama-era officials’ illegal or unethical behavior.Comey wrote a memoir, A Higher Loyalty. Its topics are principles and Comey integrity. However, Comey might have misled the FISA court and maybe lied under oath to your House committee. He was not candid with federal researchers and leaked classified and confidential authorities memos.Former FBI director Andrew McCabe also wrote a memoir, The Threat. Its argument is that America is protected by FBI kingpins such as McCabe from dangers such as Donald Trump. But McCabe himself is for lying to federal investigators. The FISA court was also fooled by mcCabe. Yet Brennan himself has lied under oath . He likely misled Congress about his role in trafficking in the Steele dossiers. And Brennan’s CIA may well have aided the FBI utilize informants abroad to entrap Trump effort in efforts to locate dirt on Trump.Former manager of National Intelligence James Clapper is a CNN analyst that often predicted a supposedly treasonous Trump would be indicted. Clapper, too, has shrunk to Congress. He once denied and then confessed to leaking confidential documents.The problem with this Muller evaluation, and with former intelligence officials such as Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and McCabe, is pious hypocrisy. Those who have lectured America on the unproven crimes of Trump have written books and appeared to publicize their own virtue. Nevertheless they have participated in all kinds of illegal and unethical behavior.The only mystery left is whether our elite investigators really think their own delusions. Or were they always broadcasting their merit as a defense against growing evidence of their moral lapses?